Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your re

Essay topics:

Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The research conducted by Behavioral Society of India in 2016 concluded that critics are essential element of any decision making body since it provides complete understanding of issues and sometimes highlight important mistakes and inconsistencies. While there are no reservations that people who think through with their ideas and disregard critics have limited scope and understanding of the affairs of the public and can jeopardise their own careers, there are reasons to believe that the behavior of neglecting the critics often led to unprecedented outcomes, which have changed the world the way someone sees it. Going ahead with adamant behavior often affords an opportunity to work on ideas relentlessly and to come out with the novel things, which could have been impeded by critics.

The first reason that supports the idea of ignoring the critics and continuing forward with the idea is that ignoring the critics saves one from wasting time, cost and energy which could have been better utilised in implementing the idea. In the political circle especially, during debates in the parliament for passing new legislations, it is not only necessary to ignore the opposition but also mandatory to ensure the passing of legislations since people had showed their confidence in the Government through votes that this Government would resort to austerity measures. A good example of this is the implementation of Goods and Service Tax regulations that was implemented in India in 2017. The idea of the Government was to amalgamate different taxes under one name with one rate of taxation to bring in uniformity. The opposition intended to block its passage through various legal challenges, but the commitment of Government to pass it by ignoring them proved that India was on the track of landmark reform. Therefore, thinking through new ideas without consideration of criticism leaves unprecedented remarks in political circle.

Second reason that buttresses the thought of going along with the idea and neglecting the critics is that it provides the opportunity to focus on idea with more passion which often resulted in unseen theories to explain behavior. In the world of economic relations among countries, it is often touted that international trade among countries put poor countries at the mercy of advanced countries since these advanced countries have skills to exploit poor countries. However, the data of past three decades from 1980 to 2010 showed that poor countries took advantage of international trade and overcome their poverty. This can be illustrated by the economic theory of international trade that was offered by Noble Prize winner, that is Paul Krugman in 2002 who postulated and predicted that by joining the forces of international trade, poor countries can enjoy relative advantage in labor costs, which would make them superior to advanced countries since labor costs in these advanced countries were higher. Initially, the theory was severely criticized because of no precedence of such occurrence, however, he continued with his work towards the relationship between poor and advanced countries. Later, in 2016, economic society of USA recognised that what Paul had predicted was valid and applicable and the society named his theory as relative price theory of international trade, which is being used today to understand international trade. Hence, critics often prevent something from being developed which would prove valid later.

However, one idea that argues that heeding to the critics often provides the opportunity to have a comprehensive understanding of issue. In the world of rationality, where everyone tries to maximize his/her return, it is said that critics highlight important points, which proponents have not understood or neglected because of being over rational. For instance, the theory of monetary policy states that when economy faces risks of depression, the central bank of a country should decrease interest rates in order to make borrowings cheaper and thus would lift the economy. However, during the time of financial crisis of 2008, bankers across the world implemented what was suggested by the theory and ignored critics who were presenting that reducing rates would not help since the problem was with risk attitudes of investors, but not with deflation in an economy. But bankers ignored these critics and went ahead with decrease in rates, which did not work but exacerbated the problem. Later, it was realised that what critics were saying was prudent and thus bankers changed their policy as per directions given by the critics which helped economies to back to normal level. Thus, sometimes critics provides the knowledge and understanding which is beneficial for the proponents.

As can be seen from above paragraphs that although critics provide comprehensive understanding of issues, but in the world of uncertainty and self-interest, critics act to prevent landmark reforms with the objective to prove their own superiority over risk-takers. Therefore, for new ideas and discovery, a person should ignore critics and continue with his/her ideas incessantly.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-27 NRS 58 view
2019-11-22 somba 66 view
2019-11-11 anirudh8860 50 view
2019-10-07 raolitesh@gmail.com 66 view
2019-08-25 shubhendrapalsinghal 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user raolitesh@gmail.com :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 708, Rule ID: NOBLE_PRIZE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Nobel Prize'?
Suggestion: Nobel Prize
...international trade that was offered by Noble Prize winner, that is Paul Krugman in 2002 wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 39.0 11.3162921348 345% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 133.0 58.6224719101 227% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4357.0 2235.4752809 195% => OK
No of words: 804.0 442.535393258 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41915422886 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.32493133829 4.55969084622 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85958122321 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 369.0 215.323595506 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458955223881 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1348.2 704.065955056 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.0372161417 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.28 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.16 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190589729512 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643464580537 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045551540053 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120766450566 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257634685688 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 48.8420337079 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 209.0 100.480337079 208% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.