The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart and table compare the export value of five different industries in a nation between 2015 and 2016.
It is noticeable that the export value in most categories witnessed an upward trend over the surveyed time. In addition, earnings gained from Petroleum Products and Engineered Goods were highest amongst other items.
Looking at the given charts for more details, there was a moderate increase in Petroleum Products' export value, from just over 60 billion to nearly 63 billion dollars - a 3% growth. A similar pattern was seen in Engineered Goods' figure, despite a faster pace, at 8.5%. In contrast, although being the least popular item exported over the period, Textiles had the highest proportion change, with 15.24%, resulting in nearly 27 million to over 30 million dollars earned from 2015 to 2016. Additionally, Agricultural Products' change went up insignificantly (only 0.81%), and its earning was about 30 million dollars throughout the given duration. The one exception to this trend was Gems and Jewellery, which experienced a 5.18% decline from around 42 million to 40 million dollars in 2016 compared with 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | phuongtran19 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | Dwi Wahyudi | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Computers do help children to learn more effectively On the contrary their usage has a negative effect on both the physical and mental development of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 89
- The process below shows the process of growing and making products from pineapple Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, well, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2349726776 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6673434672 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661202185792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0765671128 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.75 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201630184072 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923864858837 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924477029687 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169273452111 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893313492904 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.