Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.
Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Nowadays, more and more tourists flock into the tourist trap such as museums and historical sites, which help inhabitants here can gain a huge of profit but the authority figure here are still anxious because of the apathetic given by these citizens toward to those historical sites. There are many reasons put forward to explain this issue as well as many solutions coined to weaken its severity.
It is not too hard to find out reasons having the capacity of setting out this phenomenon. The main factor is lacking of curiosity about the history of where they were born and spend a main fraction of their life time here, as a result, they are a connoisseur of such information. Another factor is the ticket for entrancing, with the tourism perceptive, the government raised taxes on all of these services sprang up around spectacular landscapes as well as museum and historical sites so those who have a thirst for discovering have to pay an exorbitant price. Consequently, indigenous people felt unnecessary to take their effort into having a deep insight of the cultural and the land which they often put their feet every single day.
Coming up against this problem, many solutions brought up to address it. First of all, the authority figure changed gradually the monotonous aim at such tourist trap. They could hold meetings of women association or extra and fostered class for children in this neighborhood, which are able to capture more attraction of native. Secondly, those being the head of monitoring every gesture of such place could give some special offer to the locals including free entrance.
To sum up, there are lots of reasons proposed to explain why the locals are often indifferent to museums and historical places around them and the government also suggest a lot of clarifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-11 | Esther Katlyn | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-24 | Minh meo | 56 | view |
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female in every subject.To what extent, do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The birth rate in most developed countries is predicted to begin to fall over the next 50 years. By 2030 it is estimated that over one third of the population in most developed countries will be aged 65 and over.What effects will these predictions have o 61
- Using computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on children. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is better environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...born and spend a main fraction of their life time here, as a result, they are a connoisse...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entrancing, with the tourism perceptive, the government raised taxes on all of th...
^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ative. Secondly, those being the head of monitoring every gesture of such place c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9801980198 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67820511253 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.8200432077 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2312376277 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719783407888 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043135647488 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134125625247 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366343091116 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.