Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or reaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A growing number of people proposed that students should commit themselves to voluntary activities for the society instead of sheerly focusing on school work. I agree with this statement and the reasons will be given in the paragraphs below.
Enjoying unpaid community service can bring numerous benefits for students involved. First of all, this approach will certainly help learners gain practical knowledge as they are bound to put the theories they learn at school into practice. It is impossible for one to fully grasp an idea or a lecture if that person doesn't have hands-on experience as to how the principles can be applied. To illustrate this point, I will take myself as an example: 2 months ago, I had a chance to teach English to underprivileged children on a small scale and after that, my communication skills that the teachers imparted at me in school was thereby enhanced as well as the quality of being patient. Therefore, we can see that voluntary work without charges can help not just the whole community but also the volunteers themselves.
Secondly, satisfaction may become the immensely pleasant result of students' involvement in charitable activities. As we all know, schools' curriculums are getting more and more arduous and stressful as students will have to spend a large amount of time at academic institutions so the act of performing these aforementioned deeds can come in handy. The pleasure can be derived from supporting others in need as students begin to acknowledge the worthiness of this life. For instance, 98 percent of pupils in a survey carried out by Harvard university said affirmatively that they relished aiding neighbors and children and the lethargy were removed completely. Most students would find these activities rewarding considering the benefits they produce.
To conclude, there is no doubt that students will actually reap tangible results from their commitment as volunteers.
- The charts below show the percentage water used for different purposed in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In many countries insufficient respect is shown to older people. What do you think may be the reason for this? What problems might this cause in society? 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or reaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...asp an idea or a lecture if that person doesnt have hands-on experience as to how the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, no doubt, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24115755627 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92359177749 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659163987138 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3665775714 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136405172364 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492004634652 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491809312695 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812172858233 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618945231977 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.