These days, it seems that an increasing number of people are leaving rural areas to live in the city.
Discuss some of the effects of rural depopulation (migration from the country to the city) and suggest some ways on which this trend could be reversed.
Nowadays, rural citizen are interest to move to city to change their life better. Most people believe there are only negative effects of urbanisation and sees this trend rather as a problem, not an opportunity. I feel that urbanisation also have some positive effects. In this essay, I will discuss some effects of urbanisation, both negative and positive effects.
First of all, urbanisation causes overcrowding is a situation whereby a huge number of people live in a small space, because of overpopulation and increases day by day as more people and immigrants move into cities and towns in search of better life. With the increase in the number of people living in city, there is continued scarcity of houses. This is due to insufficient expansion space for housing and public utilities. Moreover, urbanisation affect to natural environment such as water scarcity and urban pollution. And then people’s health become poor and communicable diseases easily, for example diarrhea, ashma, cancer and many more. Meanwhile, the increasing relocation of people from rural or developing areas to urban areas is the leading cause of urban unemployment.
In positive effects, urbanisation provides efficiency. The cities are actually have efficient and easier facilities than rural areas. Also cities have more advanced communication and transportation networks. And of course, urbanisation means increasing economics. As urbanisation is closely related to industrialism, it is also related to growth of economy. As more enterprises and organizations are being established, more people can have jobs and also the added value increases.
in conclusion, I restate that urbanisation not always has a lot negative side effects, but people must focus more on the ways how to reduce these negative side effects from urbanisation. Some suggestions are: build sustainable cities that embrace improved environmental friendly; create more jobs especially in rural areas; and utilise natural resources in rural areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 73 | view |
- Lower Quality of Education 56
- Birth rate 78
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 61
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 67
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...des efficiency. The cities are actually have efficient and easier facilities than ru...
^^^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...and easier facilities than rural areas. Also cities have more advanced communication...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...bs and also the added value increases. in conclusion, I restate that urbanisation...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54397394137 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13151823147 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.639033644 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280302005382 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788660323791 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595133857576 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164921542358 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530129106758 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.