Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that developed countries are supposed to support developing countries who are suffering from natural disasters. This essay agrees with the statement because wealthy countries occupy more natural resources and every nation are responsible to protect human lives.
To begin with, developed countries are obliged to assist other nations, especially when these countries are under the threats from nature. It is commonly agreed that rich countries control more natural resources compared with poor countries. While wealthy nations exploit these resources which may be the cause of natural disasters and become richer, poor countries are vulnerable to disasters due to lack of infrastructures and money. For example, as Japan purchases a large number of woods and other natural resources from China each year, the deforestation in China becomes severe. Therefore, many responsible developed countries have given support to countries attacked by disasters such as hurricane and earthquake by donations and other assistances.
In addition, every country should protect the basic rights of human beings regardless of their races and nationalities and wealthy counties are more capable of saving lives. One of the most important human rights is the right to live. If the right is violated by disasters, humans are supposed to unite as one since the international cooperation could maximise the number of people saved from hazard. Take United Nations for example, the organisation formed by mainly developed countries sends rescue teams to assist poor countries when their people are in need.
In conclusion, developed countries are responsible to help poor countries facing natural disaster since they usually consume more resources which results in disasters in poor countries and it is a common duty for all countries to protest human lives in any circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-14 | qwe12050 | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | Deepali Chopra | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... money. For example, as Japan purchases a large number of woods and other natural resources from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun responsible seems to be countable; consider using: 'many '.
Suggestion: many
...ion in China becomes severe. Therefore, many responsible developed countries have given support ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57342657343 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80566900597 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9481017678 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248186801209 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105684315043 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610391111622 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171086922821 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580073943351 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.