The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The Bar chart illustrate the number of male and female enrolled in further education in Britain. It shows whether they were studying in full-time or part-time education over the three-period.
Overall, male engaged in full-time education had steadily increased more than female. While female engaged in part-time education was significantly risen and male had a fluctuating trend.
With regards to male studying in full-time education it increased doubled from around 100,000 in 1970 to approximately over 200,000 in 1990-91. Whereas, the female got enrolled in full-time education had a slowly increased from nearly below 200,000 in 1970 to exact 200,000 by the end of the year.
The number of male studying in part-time education had fluctuated from exact 1 million in 1970-71 and had a gradual declined which was around 850,000 in 1980-81. While it has slightly increased for about 900,000 by the end of the year, respectively. Meanwhile, there was a significant increased in female studying part-time education from below 800,000 in 1970 to above 1 million in the years 1990 and 1991.
- Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home. As a result, employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The charts below show the percentage of food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit-down restaurants. 61
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31034482759 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87264353099 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9012764929 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210742724301 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119850377453 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10852101812 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17709792211 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144821746956 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.