Food travels thousand miles from farm to consumers. Some people believe we should but food from local farmer to protect the environment and help the local business. DO the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ?
Food – basic necessity for every individual. It tries to reach even the remotest place in the world : by road, by airways, by water-ways and by train. So, all credits should be given to producer of the food, and environment which supports this production. I opine, we all should try to purchase food from farmers rather than super-markets or agents.
Despite below mentioned few drawbacks, there are manifold benefits by promoting local purchase. Firstly, due to middle-man culture, agrarians are not getting their fair share of profits. Agents make most of the money ; large segment of local producers succumb to huge losses . To abolish this discrimination consumers should purchase from local market, which inherently increase farmers fair share of profit. This movement is imperative to help agrarian society prosper and gain equity. Secondly, buying fresh items from local market helps in protecting the environment : by decreased use of chemicals and preservatives to increase shelf-life of product. Use of chemicals are one of the major cause for ozone layer depletion. As the fresh items are devoid of all these deadly additives ,which in a long run help to keep the environment intact. Furthermore, even individuals can strive towards healthy life style by consuming less preserved fresh food items.
However, on the contrary, there are 2 minor problems associated with the support of local purchase. Primarily, local sellers and buyers are not staying in close proximity, which makes buyers to spend lot of time to drive to the location of local market. Secondly, local market might not necessarily have stock of all the items which are demanded by the buyer; eventually it will make buyer go back to super-market.
In conclusion, tough there are time and proximity issues in promoting local business, the stark positive impact on agrarian society, individual’s improved healthy lifestyle, and environment protection stand stead to support this advancement in local purchase.
- Many people are spending lot of money on their weddings. Do you think this is a good thing? 84
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away. 84
- Food travels thousand miles from farm to consumers. Some people believe we should but food from local farmer to protect the environment and help the local business. DO the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 84
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write innewspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think webecome used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 56
- Food travels thousand miles from farm to consumers. Some people believe we should but food from local farmer to protect the environment and help the local business. DO the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 274, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f local producers succumb to huge losses . To abolish this discrimination consumer...
^^
Line 2, column 786, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...are devoid of all these deadly additives ,which in a long run help to keep the en...
^^
Line 2, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oid of all these deadly additives ,which in a long run help to keep the environme...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...l sellers and buyers are not staying in close proximity, which makes buyers to spend lot of tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37060702875 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8823245624 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61661341853 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2114001077 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8823529412 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258780763311 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077044771326 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602498840816 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151171438199 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04315910055 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.