playing after schools
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on playing after school or taking extra classes can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments which were existed on either side, playing after school has many privileges as per the following illustration.
To commence with, playing after school can develop interpersonal skills, and it might boost the mood of the young generation. Moreover, as soon as they will play, their intercultural skills may be enhanced. For instance, as per a recent study which was published recently, the majority of British citizens consider playing is vital for children's' social status. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that educationalists should conduct extra-curricular activities to encourage youngsters about playing after schools
Additionally, another important aspect associated with is playing after school that it could enhance communications skills. In addition, it is crucial to note that when children play after school, their study level can be improved. Consequently, it exemplifies that authorities should launch awareness campaigns to boost their citizens' knowledge about playing after schools.
In conclusion, after a manifested the above notions, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support my idea, and hence my opinion is that playing after school have a dramatic role to develop learners and societies as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-20 | aymanwahab | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82062780269 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22124201023 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645739910314 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2720951502 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.222222222 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.25397266985 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.602318833033 0.242375264174 249% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.265871796437 0.0925447433944 287% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117978969128 0.071462118173 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394403647423 0.151781067708 260% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599142901099 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.