You have recently attended a work-related course. Write a letter to your manager and say
– What course was it, and when did you take it?
– What did you like about it?
– What improvements can be made in the future?
Dear Sir,
I am writing this letter to tell you about my latest three-day crash course on Value Added Tax topic. This short course was organized by the Federal tax Authority in Dubai. They planned it from 1st May to 3rd May 2019 and 1st Jun to 3rd Jun 2019. I attended it in May batch.
I liked about many points about this course. Firstly, I liked the idea to make business community aware, and not to simply enact the law and levy penalty. Further, staff was mainly from Ministry itself. Team was highly qualified and had relevant work experience from the Big 4 audit firms. Content and planning was also impressive. They started the presentation with the historical background of VAT and reason for introducing VAT. Gradually, they progressed with registration and invoicing. Finally, they ended the lecture with hefty penalties for anyone’s wrongdoings and their tax evasion. Overall, presentation was well organized
On the other hand, there are some areas for improvement with regards to selection of speakers, which may bring more clarity on the topic. Speakers were not pretty much confident in reverse charge mechanism, probably, due to lack of exposure. I suggest that speaker’s selection should be based on experience in relevant field rather than simply being staff of Big 4.
With this, I would like to wrap up with a note of thanks to nominate on company behalf and helping me to sharpen my skill set with this course.
Yours sincerely
Tom Edward
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education. Or is it the responsibility of the government of the poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves. 56
- Some people think that people should choose their job based on income in order to provide security for their family.Do you think money is an important factor when choosing a job?What other factors should be considered? 84
- You have recently attended a work-related course. Write a letter to your manager and say– What course was it, and when did you take it?– What did you like about it?– What improvements can be made in the future? 81
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industries to move to regional areas outside the urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweighs the disadvantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, well, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 937.175257732 133% => OK
No of words: 248.0 206.0 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00806451613 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65643496479 2.54303337028 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 127.690721649 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653225806452 0.622605031667 105% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 290.88556701 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.13402061856 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7230944322 44.8134815571 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0588235294 76.5299724578 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5882352941 16.8248392259 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 4.34317383033 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121409379455 0.216113520407 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377847898762 0.0766984524023 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391703569697 0.0603063233224 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620355290831 0.12726935374 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331116859426 0.0580467560999 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 8.37731958763 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 41.2886597938 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 8.62886597938 64% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.4606741573 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.25 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.