Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Merit-based salaries have been applied in varies fields with varying successes for quite some time. As it has it's advantages when applied in quantifiable fields such as software development, however, less practical when professions which yield result in long-term is considered. Teaching falls in the latter category. The prompt suggests that students academic performance should be the sole judge for teacher's salary. I mostly disagree with this claim as the teacher's job is far more complexed than just ensuring student get good grades.
First of all, judging solely on academic results ignores all the other impacts teacher has on it's students. Student in his early years is not only developing his academic skills but also his mental skills. For someone who is involved in most of the students early development, it is necessary that they ingrain moral values in their students along with academic. For instance, Sachin Tendulkar-one of the all-time greatest batsman- still acknowledges his school teacher not because she taught him how to solve algebra but, because she taught him a valuable lesson that "nothing comes easy in life". This shows that the teacher has far more duties than just improving his students' grades.
Furthermore, teacher is not the only reason that has an impact on student's performance. The school's ambiance and its infrastructure is equally responsible. For example, if the school is located near a construction site, then no matter how good the teacher is because of noise pollution the student wouldn't be able to comprehend what the teacher taught them. Moreover, if the school doesn't provide enough facilities i.e., laboratories, library, etc. it can seriously hinder students learning abilities. In such a case, a teacher's role in teaching is limited because of external factors.
Finally, some might say that a merit-based salary can encourage a teacher to focus more on his students. It might be true but it can also have adverse effects as the teacher might be bent to just focus on the academic part of the job and might not be interested in making the student a better person. In the above case, though it might have a good impact on students academic, however, his ingeniousness might be hindered. Thus, making student one-dimensional.
In conclusion, I would say that due to the complex nature of teacher's job it is not advisable to judge them just based on their students' academic performance thus, such a system shouldn't be implemented.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
2019-12-06 | sagar2052 | 50 | view |
2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
2019-09-14 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co 63
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the business manager of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States."For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses. Last year, howe 86
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies 34
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'impacts'' or 'impact's'?
Suggestion: impacts'; impact's
... academic results ignores all the other impacts teacher has on its students. Student in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...t the only reason that has an impact on students performance. The schools ambiance and i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
... an impact on students performance. The schools ambiance and its infrastructure is equa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... because of noise pollution the student wouldnt be able to comprehend what the teacher ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...er taught them. Moreover, if the school doesnt provide enough facilities i.e., laborat...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...s learning abilities. In such a case, a teachers role in teaching is limited because of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...cademic performance thus, such a system shouldnt be implemented.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19554455446 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84377718356 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.180467228 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9523809524 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217878713289 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638199366532 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473532257028 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127472445921 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313003499489 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.