The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph gives information about the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2014. The data presents in the grams. Overall, it can be seen that the most increase was chicken while the most decrease was beef.
In the one hand in 1979, beef gained at around 200g to 250g which the biggest category of the grams. Than, followed by chicken and lamb which stood at about 100g to 150g. And the last position was fish which was standing at approximately 50g to 100g.
On the other hand in 2004, chicken’s grams of the meat consumption graph happened to be increase which was counted at above 100g. However, beef, lamb, and fish experienced decrease. Beef dropped which noted at over a half of beef’s gram in 1979 whilst lamb and fish’s grams declined which was under in middle of their grams in 1979.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
- Some experts believe that is is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages? 56
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...hich the biggest category of the grams. Than, followed by chicken and lamb which sto...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 716.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49237063001 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 191.7 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9196724299 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5555555556 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229465439256 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10756720838 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184640012035 0.0843802449381 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174832694839 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1296244783 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.