The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned?
<p class="MsoNormal">Humans are the most dangerous animal on this planet, as we
have ascending scientific opportunities to cultivate various remedies to safeguard
our future, but are other animals or species on earth gifted by such talent?
Therefore, in the world where survival of the fittest is the only rule that
follows, I would like to add that most powerful should take care of the most
vulnerable as well.<o:p></o:p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">Zoo are good source of income around the world in almost all
countries, even zoo are much adored by all ages of people. From years the
motive of zoo has change a lot from just caging animal to preserving them with
their natural existence pattern. It has been essential onus of government to
make sure that all Zoo authorities are performing their duties with high regards
to avoid any hazards to animal or human in Zoo. Zoo in 21st century is no more
to keep the animal for charity collection or display. As per a journal in
Harvard University tons of N.G.O across the globe has helped to upfront the
right of animals and preservation of special species. </p><p class="MsoNormal">Many Zoo are now being converted into more of an open Zoo,
where visitors are into a cage to view animals, we have large aquarium where
all sea animals get full space to live and swim. The most important concern has
shifted toward animal safety and preservation in present days. More young
people are trained and given jobs in Zoo so that we get good and proper care
for the Animals with an ascending in job opportunities within the country. This
helps to increase the tourist attraction and solve the job scarcity issue,
resulting in the GDP growth of the country.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Albeit humans are most dangerous animal but we are caring for the most vulnerable and saving for new generation.</p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | bashob | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | 029ashish@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
- Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable. Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 77
- Assessment of student performance using formal methods like a written formal examination. Give your point 88
- As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks? 77
- What do you think about our environment considering the fact that there has been steady increase in pollution and affects like global warming are increasing as time is passing by? Are we under jeopardy? Is the humanity safe? 11
- Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable. Choose whether you agree or disagree with this statement and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...imal for charity collection or display. As per a journal in Harvard University to...
^^
Line 15, column 32, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: O
...rnal in Harvard University tons of N.G.O across the globe has helped to upfront ...
^
Line 16, column 90, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Zoo seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many zoos'.
Suggestion: Many zoos
...ies.
Many Zoo are now being converted into more of an...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.58252508756 2.71678728327 169% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.1882242537 50.4703680194 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.0 104.977214359 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 20.9669160288 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 7.25397266985 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.12807881773 509% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252994598183 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114221162561 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393869349733 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743522337987 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550205452621 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 12.6369458128 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.94827586207 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.