the graph below gives information about internet user in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

the graph below gives information about internet user in three countries between 1999 and 2009. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph illustates the amount of three kinds states sources (canada, mexico, and usa), which were used internet over 10 years from 1999 to 2009. Units are mesured in percentage of population (%). Overall, it can be seen that the highest internet consumer as percentage of habitat was canada while the most negative was mexico.

With regards to the amount of mexico used, it began at around considerable less than percentage (%) and then remained rose constant slowly. In 1999 canada falling dramatically under middle percentage (%), whereas in 2009 iver middle percentage (%) was increased steadly. internet user in usa was changed.

From 1999 and 2009, in general three catagories were fluctuated using internet by percentage of population, also as long as years rising were increased steadly its. In the other hand, it was clear that the higher ratio canada in 2009 and beside one of the smallest mexico in 1999.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-28 RAHMAYANI 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umer as percentage of habitat was canada while the most negative was mexico. W...
^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Internet
...dle percentage % was increased steadly. internet user in usa was changed. From 1999 a...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, whereas, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13422818792 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53805249222 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657718120805 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.151550086 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107923228758 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524542523077 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407878954844 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813784363927 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174761051132 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.