While recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to personal qualities rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recruitment processes are critical for any organization to hire right candidate for their working culture. It is argued by some individuals that recruiting officers should focus on personal attributes of the applying candidate instead of qualification and years of experience. I strongly disagree and believe that knowledge and years of work in the same field are critical essential to run the business smoothly.
Firstly, education makes the employee aware of the requirements in the organization to conduct business activities without hurdle. For instance, study in food microbiology educate the learner about the various requirements and compliance, which should be followed by an organization to comply government and non-government regulations, therefore hiring microbiologist in the food industry can directly benefits the company in terms of quality compliance and for those reasons the hiring authority should pay attention to educational qualifications.
Secondly, years of experience teaches an individual how to deal with different situations under pressure, therefore experience is an important aspect to be considered while hiring a candidate. The regular work on same thing calibrates an individual to become enough competent and strong candidate to make right decisions for the organizations. For that reason, only managers are paid high salaries as compared with inexperienced employees. Hence, recruitment steps should priorities experienced candidate on top of the hiring list.
However, personal qualities like good in sports can also benefits an organization in terms of social activities and gathering, it has little impacts on the business.
In conclusion, I do not believe that private features benefit the organization in running business although, qualifications and experience can play vital role. Thus, employer must pay attention to these factors rather than personal qualities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | Hai Bung Bia | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 61
- The only way to improve the safety on our own roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders To what extent do you agree 73
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- As Countries have developed there has been a trend towards smaller family sizes Why does this happen?How does it affect society? 78
- With the development of online communication, people will never be alone and will always be able to make new friends. To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed candidate on top of the hiring list. However, personal qualities like good in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91007194245 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25993165444 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607913669065 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0102526496 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.916666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170997538511 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064260995561 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722334597242 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964170168237 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580520800584 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.