The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both target and actual and the number of complaints from the passengers from 1999 to 2003.
The first bar chart compares the proportions of the actual and expected punctuality in a bus company while the second bar chart illustrates how many complaints made by the travellers from 1999 to 2003.
Overall, the real figures for the bus coming on time did not meet the expectations during the period shown. Additionally, there was a drastic increase in terms of passengers’ complains.
Regarding the first chart, in 1999, 86% buses arriving on time which was almost equal to the expected figure. After a year, there was a drop of about 3% in the reality, compared with the same expectation in the previous year. In 2001 and 2002, the expectation fell to 85% while the actual figures climbed back to just over 84%. The following year experienced a surprise when the real percentage for the on-time bus service reached under 85%, which was about 0.5% higher than the expected.
The total complaints from the passengers were approximately 70,000 in 1999; then considerably reaching 100,000 after a year. There was a fall of almost 20,000 complaints in 2001 before gradually rising to 120,000 complaints made by the bus commuters at the end of the surveyed period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-29 | quanganh3110 | 69 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010 80
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 84
- Some people think that social skills are as important as academic qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female smokers in Britain during the period between 1950 and 1990 86
- the charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to Park Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service with 100 guests in 2005 and 2010. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02551020408 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81630342345 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1852241715 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216808274432 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084327086149 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829788106045 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141091842781 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901819552456 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.