The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The chart gives information about the percentage of tourists who traveled to Edinburgh and visited four attractions, including the aquarium, the castle, the zoo and a festival from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, Edinburgh's castle gained some popularity over the years, ending up being the most visited attraction in 2010. While the percentage of visitors to the aquarium decreased considerably, the zoo's rate rose steadily in the last 10 years.
In 1980, the festival was the most visited Scottish attraction, with 30% of the tourists coming to take part. This figure decreased marginally to reach 25% in 1995, and it steadily remained just above this rate from 2000. Conversely, the percentage of people visiting the castle was approximately 25% at the beginning of the time period, but it climbed considerably to reach 45% 15 years later. The proportion dropped gradually to finally reach just above 30% in 2010.
The zoo's and aquarium's percentages changed similarly over the period, starting at 10% and 20% respectively in 1980. Then, the tourists' rate increased by 5 and 15 percentage points, but it decreased again to reach 10% and 20% respectively in 2000. Things changed in the last decade when the zoo's visitors' figure jumped to 20 %, while aquarium's one fell below 10%.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-31 ludovicag 84 view
2019-07-23 Afict 56 view
2019-07-23 Afict 56 view
2019-03-21 SannaCoconut 73 view
Essays by user ludovicag :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, similarly, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80457883044 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552884615385 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2504263538 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132321443013 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544760919257 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481979892773 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930863850507 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481745122033 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.