Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I agree with the recommendation that governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. The problems of the present outweigh the problems of future and deserve a significant chunk of valuable and limited resources of governments.
Today's problems are real and need to be solved. The anticipated problems of the future have a sense of uncertainty associated with them. They may actually turn out to be completely different from what we expected of them. There are cases in the past of governments neglecting the existing and apparent problems of declining education and healthcare, and choosing to focus rather on building the infrastructure for the anticipated utopian future that never came about.
People elect governments for their representatives to solve existing problems. Most of the problems of future have their roots in the negligence of today's seemingly minor issues. Solving the problems of present may actually turn out to be helpful in the future. Improving healthcare in the present could save entire nations from fatal epidemics of future.
However there are exceptions like global warming and rising sea levels that the scientific community is so sure of. In such cases preventive measures are a no brainer. Getting ready for the future ensures stability in the long term. If not stability, these measures are sure to at least provide us with a buffer time for us to respond.
While there exist problems of future that we need to be ready for, they cannot outweigh the importance and urgency of the immediate problems that are so real and in need of immediate action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ations from fatal epidemics of future. However there are exceptions like global warmin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 274.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13503649635 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84047838195 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4433864529 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306746667817 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108389602488 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156232915244 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189339596503 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161966100452 0.0667264976115 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.