In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem?
In modern times, art galleries around the world are facing people’s neglect and apathy. Once considered a wise man possession and hobby, art is not associated with rich people only. This essay will discuss the reasons for the neglect and discover the possible solutions to increase the interest in art.
To begin with, art galleries today are in a pathetic state. The scenes of art lovers thronging the place and adorning the minute details of paintings for hours are thing of past. This dwindling number of art lovers can be attributed to increased interest in science and a busy routine. With science taking the center stage, the art has shifted to the background. Also, people today are living a busy life which hardly spares them any time to watch and adorn the beauty.
Moreover, apart from facing public apathy, the art galleries are also a victim of the government’s ignorance. The governments across the world hardly have any policy and budget for their revival and upkeep. Consequently, many of these galleries have failed to keep pace with the changing time.
There are numerous ways through which the fading art galleries can be revived. Firstly, Schools and colleges should help revive interest in art by adding a visit to these places in their curriculum. Secondly, the government should seek private intervention either as part of CSR activity to modernize these galleries and spend some amount on their marketing and publicity.
To conclude, there is a compelling need to restore and reinvent the art galleries. Though the solutions mentioned above are not a panacea to this problem, they can at least provide a start and set actions in motion. There is no time for us to be complacent and let it decline further. The history should be preserved and art is the best reflection of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Faraj.khalikov | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | khanpeter | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Bhawna Sharma | 78 | view |
- Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference.Write a letter to a former teacher. In your letter:give details of the jobexplain why it is important to yousuggest what information your teacher could put in the reference 78
- More and more developing countries are expanding their tourist industries. Why is this? Is it a positive development? 73
- Many parents encourage young people to leave home when they become older, while others think they should stay at home with the family. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, as a result, more adults work at home and children learn at home. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to keep pace with the changing time. There are numerous ways through which th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, apart from, at least, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97697368421 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65323123639 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8268913362 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0555555556 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264197706219 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770045783823 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470213000922 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139010514799 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438408508294 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.