The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990.
<p style="margin-bottom: 1rem; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);">The pie charts give information about the proportion of five different sources of energy in the USA: oil, natural gas, coal, hydroelectric power and nuclear power between 1980 and 1990. It is noticeable that the amount of oil-consuming decreased and that of hydroelectric power still maintained. By contrast, there was a significant growth in the amount of coal and nuclear power using as one of the main sources.</p><br style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);"><p style="margin-bottom: 1rem; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);">Oil consumption accounted for 42% in 1980. Despite its dramatic decreasing to 33%, oil was still has a good proportion in 1990. The percentage of natural gas-consuming also saw a slight decline but only decreased from 26% to 25%. That of hydroelectric power remained at 5% after ten years.</p><br style="color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);"><p style="margin-bottom: 1rem; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8); font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(249, 249, 249);">On the other hand, the proportion of using nuclear power was similar to the percentage of hydroelectric power in 1980, at exactly 5 percent. This then made up about 10% in 1990 while the rate of coal-using grew from almost a fifth to just under a third.</p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Nina_OY | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | view |
- the expenditure on fast food by different income groups in UK in 1990 67
- The main sources of energy of USA in 1980 and 1990. 61
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The pie chart shows the main sources of energy for USA in 1980 and 1990 36
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 965.302439024 236% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.28434504792 4.92477711251 148% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.6616144726 2.65546596893 176% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428115015974 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 283.868780488 198% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 323.122646835 43.030603864 751% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 325.714285714 112.824112599 289% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.7142857143 22.9334400587 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0522535034035 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376494228038 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394371723887 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522535034035 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.2 13.2329268293 266% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 9.9 61.2550243902 16% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.8 10.3012195122 221% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 25.83 11.4140731707 226% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.