TOPIC: Nowadays many students study to become white collar workers rather manual workers. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is more and more popular for many students learn to do intellectual jobs rather manual jobs. Although doing this has several drawbacks, the advantages are far more significant.
There are some disadvantages which can be stemmed from becoming white collar workers. Firstly, there are more intellectual labors nowadays which results in increasing the competitiveness in job market. This leads to higher unemployment rate even social issues. Another drawback could be that there are not enough manual workers. The bad thing about it is that the nation will lack the labors in physically-demanding jobs. Consequently, the country may suffer from hindering the development of some fields.
Nevertheless, doing this can bring some positive impacts which overshadow these downsides. One benefit could be that learning to do intellectual jobs can encourage people to gain in-depth knowledge and expertises. The good thing about it is that people become more creative and innovative. As a result, they will contribute to their nation. Secondly, becoming white collar labors can not only allow people to earn higher income but also they can have better working conditions with modern facilities. Therefore, they can improve the standard of living both financially and emotionally and reduce the risk of accident.
In conclusion, despite the drawbacks of studying to become white collar workers can bring, it still does more good than harm.
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 89
- Goods transported in UK (1974-2002). 56
- Coal consumption by sectors in the UK in million tonnes 57
- The media should include more stories which report good news rather than bad news To what extent you agree or disagree 66
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, even so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47533632287 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96318581061 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614349775785 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7600832532 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8666666667 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230460622318 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671903998514 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614241953673 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140987546875 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405744895404 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.