The pie charts below show the different reasons for flight delays in a particular Asian country in 2015 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the different reasons for flight delays in a particular
Asian country in 2015 and 2016.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.

A detailed comparitive study has been made between various factors that led to flight delay and has been illustrated as a pie chart.
In detail,the airplane operations and management has hit a high off from 40% in the year 2015 to 46% in 2016.One of the common scenarios that has caused an obstacle is the weather at a range 21-23%.There has been a significant decline for the air traffic control with a difference of 13% within a year.

On the contrary,there has been a rise in airport security with a variation of 9% while the military reason has gone down to 6%.

Votes
Average: 8 (12 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-04 vuhieuquy 75 view
2019-08-13 Janu1998 80 view
Essays by user Janu1998 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...n illustrated as a pie chart. In detail,the airplane operations and management has ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: One
...rom 40% in the year 2015 to 46% in 2016.One of the common scenarios that has caused...
^^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...stacle is the weather at a range 21-23%.There has been a significant decline for the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...of 13% within a year. On the contrary,there has been a rise in airport security wit...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 468.0 965.302439024 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 102.0 196.424390244 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58823529412 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.17797182781 3.73543355544 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87554217344 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.686274509804 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 143.1 283.868780488 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.3428956127 43.030603864 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118582580414 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719079829041 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034194282652 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719079829041 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034194282652 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.