The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
“Do authorities ensure well-being of a society”? The research has shown that authorities intend to provide environment conducive to well-being of society and its citizen, however, due to the varied nature of problems and constant change in the environment the authorities are operating in, sometimes authorities are unable to address the concerns of a whole society and thus, it focuses on priorities. The prompt points out to a widely accepted belief that if authorities are questioned, only then well-being of a society can be guaranteed. In my view I strongly agree with the claim and exemplify that due to practice of following the priorities, the authorities must be questioned on how they decide the priority and how they are planning to address them in the coming years. The reasons justifying my view are mentioned in the following paragraphs.
First of all, as everyone has right to security from the social evils such as molestation, trafficking and smuggling etc., thus, authorities must not only be questioned but also provide answers as to how they are working on ensuring safety and security of its citizens. For example, when one of the most macabre cases of rape and molestation registered in India, it attracted the attention of world media on the deteriorating law enforcement agencies of India. Media, social rights activists and NGOs collaborated and questioned the authority on such grave incidents. The authorities were forced to promulgate a law deterring any one resort to such measures must be executed. As a result, the crime against women significantly stemmed. Further, when the incident of mass exploitation of children and further involved them in human trafficking in India came under limelight, the authorities were questioned on enforcing child safety laws and people asked the authorities to present the process on this case to a elected leader on daily basis. Such inquiry into the justice made the authorities to pull up their socks and bring convicts under trials. Therefore, questioning of authorities is necessary in order to ensure the safety of women and children in a society like India.
Secondly, as everyone aspire to do better in business and hopes to reach to the pinnacle but the malevolence of bureaucracy and red-tapism to prevent it, makes the strong case for questioning the authorities responsible for regulating the business rules. For example, when World Bank started to publish the rankings of countries on different parameters with the objective to find out which countries are more open to adapt their rules to facilitate business growth, the media houses that were focussed on business and employment growth started to question authorities on why India ranks low among other developing countries, the authorities started to work on facilitating business processes and as a result the rank of India improved by 30 points. Further, as it known that authorities are sceptical about innovation and new discovery since it leads to unconventional wisdom and it disrupt the society initially, the authorities in India were pulled up by not only people those working on innovative ideas but also by judiciary when India lags behind on innovation index due to its lax policies on protecting intellectual property rights. As a result India came out with a blue print of new laws protecting intellectual products and services from plagiarism and theft etc. Therefore, questioning the authorities is obligatory on a society if it intends to see the reform in a society.
Finally, as it is known that in the time run up to the elections, authorities uses the resources extravagantly to deceive the voters. This practice had resulted in loss of millions of dollars spent on reckless schemes. As it grew overwhelmingly, the group consists of economists, researchers and political pundits starts questioning the intention of authorities on such spending and asks them to furnish reports in the parliament on the efficacy of such schemes which subsequently made the authorities to stem the flow of money into such practices and thus, brought in financial responsibility among them. Further, as known that during election campaigns, political aspirants spend unprecedented amount of money to lure voters and it also leads to increase in the flow of black money, the authorities in India were forced to monitor the advertising campaign of these political parties and asked each party to submit the undertaking on not exceeding the prescribed financial limit on spending. As a result, the illicit flow of money stemmed to a great extent. Therefore, questioning the authorities is necessary in order to bring in transparency in a society.
Of course some may argue that questioning the authorities may often lead to protests and prevent the functioning of authorities such as during the recent outbreak in Hong Kong which locked the society for more than 10 weeks in a row. However, the proponents of this claim must understand that questioning leads to inciting the anger among public only when the society runs by dictators who want unquestionable obedience to authority. In a society where people values and their well-being are of utmost importance, questioning leads to healthy democracy and brings in possible equality.
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium — substances essential for building and maintaining bones. Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis, a disease that is linked to both environment 55
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 37
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 627, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...re forced to promulgate a law deterring any one resort to such measures must be execute...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1010, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... to present the process on this case to a elected leader on daily basis. Such inq...
^
Line 5, column 884, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disrupts'?
Suggestion: disrupts
...t leads to unconventional wisdom and it disrupt the society initially, the authorities ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, of course, such as, as a result, first of all, in my view, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 152.0 58.6224719101 259% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4442.0 2235.4752809 199% => OK
No of words: 846.0 442.535393258 191% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25059101655 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.3931511331 4.55969084622 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05379525958 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 390.0 215.323595506 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460992907801 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1402.2 704.065955056 199% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.779129152 60.3974514979 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.518518519 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146312219818 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450768576804 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308235636243 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948558878145 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038015869693 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 48.8420337079 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 211.0 100.480337079 210% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.