Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of theoretical and practical education in universities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that functional science is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical training can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From educational standpoint, operational experience can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that salient knowledge of theories, as well as failure in job vacancy are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered prosperous industry. Thus beneficial ramification of both implementing of science and growth in economy apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, expert employee might increase the pervasive consequences of boosting productivity, and fundamental aspects of confident attempt rely to this reality that the demerits of work efficiency pertain to less expenditure. As a tangible example some scientific research undertaken by prestigious universities has asserted that the downside of vicious circle in job seeking is correlated negatively with revising the structure of academic learning. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational revolution.
To conclude, while there compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical training far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of functional and expert working prove the significance of developing industry, but also pinpoint the implication of reliable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | alireza_esml@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | Sandeep93 | 85 | view |
- ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY. 80
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- Foreign languages should be compulsory in the primary school. How far do you agree with the above statement? 85
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by human 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t which discovered prosperous industry. Thus beneficial ramification of both impleme...
^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...efficiency pertain to less expenditure. As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ing the structure of academic learning. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83397683398 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30493811469 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667953667954 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.573104657 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.363636364 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138460665802 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445136558972 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402819743852 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735348128265 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241736906755 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.