If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Experience teaches you many things. Then it very well maybe a positive experience or a negative experience. But one thing is sure that something useful would obviously be gained from it. The idea that the job should go to an applicant having more experience in case both the applicants have the same academic qualification is to a certain degree agreeable for the following reasons.
Nowadays in the ever growing market flourishing with new opportunities and with numerous applicants available for a single position, the company in order to stay in the competition should definitely give the job to a person with more experience. For instance, consider a job in the certain industry which totally works on skills required for craftsmanship, two applicants with equal qualifications apply for an opening. The only criteria for differentiating between them are the amount of experience both of them have. The hiring committee would definitely prefer the person who is working in similar industry for past few years rather a graduate who has just completed his or her education or someone with less experience. The amount of experience a person has would have a great impact on his or her working in the company. As the person is already exposed and accustomed as to how things work there will not be a problem for him to catch up to the required standards of the company’s employees.
Another important factor for deciding who to give the job is the training required to work in the company. The person with no experience has no practical idea to know how the industries actually work. Although the place from where he graduated may have tried to give some idea about the status quo of the companies, the company still would be compelled to give him or her training before they could start any actual work which generates revenues for the company. Thus the precious time and money of the institution is wasted which otherwise would have been saved if they had selected a person with experience in the field. He would not have to undergo training and would start working as soon he completes his joining.
However, as intriguing it would seem to give a job to more experienced applicant, it would not always be a great path to follow. There are many fields of work which do not require skills or any kind of experience to start working efficiently. In such a case providing the job to a more experienced person may or may not be a beneficial move for the company. For example a software developing company would very well like to employ someone who has more knowledge about the subject at hand rather an experienced person with lesser knowledge comparatively. This is just one example; there are many more industries which do not rely completely on experience and would still like to look out for a more informative applicant.
In spite of all the various thought processes given to the idea, one still requires a comprehensive understanding about the topic. As it remains a complex issue, there are no easy answers for the whole idea of always preferring a more experienced person over a person with little or no experience.
- The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn 82
- Five years ago, the local university built two new dormitories through different contractors: Aleph Construction and Gimmel Builders. The buildings were nearly identical, though it cost Gimmel Builders approximately 20 percent more to construct their dorm 59
- Company X has just switched to a 4-day workweek, mandating that employees work 10 hours per day from Monday to Thursday instead of 8 hours per day from Monday to Friday. Although the policy is new, Company X claims that the policy will help to increase pr 80
- The following appeared as part of a business plan developed by the manager of the Rialto Movie Theater."Despite its downtown location, the Rialto Movie Theater, a local institution for five decades, must make big changes or close its doors forever. I 63
- Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 725, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cation or someone with less experience. The amount of experience a person has would...
^^^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ich generates revenues for the company. Thus the precious time and money of the inst...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, kind of, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2604.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87640449438 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84296061502 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453183520599 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3439115046 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.363636364 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262974286364 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831930780309 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797255218999 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155765738049 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652386859957 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.