Nowadays, people always throw old things away and buy new things, whereas in the past, old things were repaired and used again. What factors cause this phenomenon? What effects does the phenomenon lead to?
In the past, everyone know we didn’t have an amount of capital to invest something to make benefits for our life. So we were just repaired and used again to figure out something new. But you know when people were completed products, they think it was not enough to serve our life. So they will upgrade that product, fix the gap. It was made a domino-effects. The buyers and customers must to change the product suitable with age. Whereas someone didn’t have condition to buy the new one. That phenomenon show how we were wasted. The community want something new, something modern or can change the world. The clearly example was electronic. Many electronic had been thrown to the trash.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-16 | nguyen anh huy | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | nguyen anh huy | 22 | view |
- you have been doing some voluntary work to help your local community. However, nou you are unable to continue doing this work.Write a letter to manager of the ogranisation where you have been working. 89
- Nowadays, people always throw old things away and buy new things, whereas in the past, old things were repaired and used again. What factors cause this phenomenon? What effects does the phenomenon lead to? 22
- Some people think that prison sentences should not be used in dealing with criminals. Education and job training should be used instead.To what extent do you agree on disagree? 56
- Many countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors to take part in major sports competitions such as the Olympics, football world cup etc. Some people think that it would be better to spend this money to encourage children to take part in sports in 56
- Nowadays, people always throw old things away and buy new things, whereas in the past, old things were repaired and used again. What factors cause this phenomenon? What effects does the phenomenon lead to? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...omino-effects. The buyers and customers must to change the product suitable with age. W...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 652, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun electronic seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many electronics'.
Suggestion: Many electronics
...ld. The clearly example was electronic. Many electronic had been thrown to the trash.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 41.998997996 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 577.0 1615.20841683 36% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 120.0 315.596192385 38% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80833333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 4.20363070211 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58294351898 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 176.041082164 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.716666666667 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 180.0 506.74238477 36% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0149353162 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 52.4545454545 106.682146367 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.9090909091 20.7667163134 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118781441592 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414212339844 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517945619182 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118781441592 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.7 13.0946893788 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.79 50.2224549098 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.43 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 78.4519038076 29% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.