TPO 20
The article states that let it burn policy cause large scale damage which provides three examples of support. however, the professor explains that although it is a natural disaster, it creates new opportunities for animals and plants and refutes each of the reading examples.
First, The author claims that the vegetations and plants had been scorched after the fire died out. The professor refutes this point by saying that new small plants grew instead of scorched plants. this is due to the open and unshaded area that was created after the fire died out. also, the seeds of plants, that need extreme heat were able to grow.
Second, the article posits that wildlife like deer and elk were forced to leave their habitats and it is almost impossible to return to it due to the disruption of the food chain. however, the professor indicates that the wildlife would recover after the fire and new opportunities for small animals like rabbits and rats will rise. As the professor explains, the small plants would attract these small animals, and in return, preditors would return to these habitats as well.
Third, the reading claims that the tourist attraction of the park would decrease. the professor opposes this idea by explaining that the fire in the Yellowstone park does not happen every year and this phenomenon is unusual. The combination of low rain and hight winds does not happen every year so this kind of fire is rare. also, the tourists came back to the park the year after.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- TPO 20 68
- The main idea of both the reading and the lecture is about Robert Peary’s claim. The reading states that he reached the North Pole and presents three reasons. However, the professor asserts that this evidence is actually very uncertain. She refutes each 70
- TPO20 68
- TPO21 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ich provides three examples of support. however, the professor explains that although i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...plants grew instead of scorched plants. this is due to the open and unshaded area th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...at was created after the fire died out. also, the seeds of plants, that need extreme...
^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ue to the disruption of the food chain. however, the professor indicates that the wildl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... attraction of the park would decrease. the professor opposes this idea by explaini...
^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...very year so this kind of fire is rare. also, the tourists came back to the park the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85490196078 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31935506554 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3703676554 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2307692308 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286137036573 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982523730112 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492825868886 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156826615056 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00670995424354 0.0443174109184 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.