In many part of the world, people do research in their family history. Some people believe that finding out about previous generations is an useful thing to do. Other however, it is better to focus on present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In recent years, many people spend money to find the linkage with their ancestors while others focus on the present and future of their families. In my opinion, researching about the past, the present and the future generations are equally important.
On the one hand, researching our ancestry brings several benefits. Understanding the origin of ancestors and their past achievements could improve the self-esteem and confident of many individuals and, as a result of this, it might encourage people to continue preserving their heritage and family traditions. Another advantage is that people can prevent genetic disorders by carefully examine the past historical records of their family members. There are many genetic diseases which the future generations are inherited from their ancestries such as Down syndrome, cancer and diabetes. By researching the family history, people may aware of the potential risk of developing genetic disorders and they could have early preventative measures to avoid illness.
On the other hand, it is argued that the present and future generations should receive more attention than looking at the past. The reason for this is that there are many negative impacts on the present generations which require immediate actions from the people rather than discovering historical connections. Drug abuse, food poisoning and raising unemployment rate are some examples of the immediate threats to the living of many individuals. Another reason is that history cannot be changed and therefore, family members should invest their financial resources to change the future. Instead of spending time to research the history, people could use the available resources to build more schools, hospitals and infrastructure to ensure a sustainable environment for the future development of younger generations.
In conclusion, I believe that understanding the past ancestors and investing for the present and future generations are equally important as there are many benefits on both sides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-18 | nguyenken91 | 82 | view |
- Government should invest on teaching science subjects (maths, engineering, science, technology) rather than other subject (art, literature, history, language) for country develop and progress . To what extend do you agree or not agree. 73
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live a new country. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Some people think that the teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject they are best at or they are most interested in. To what extend do you agree? 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58823529412 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88636656811 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545751633987 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7696832557 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304554581454 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106281521068 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516254164705 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194952572069 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501956487031 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.