Tpo 22
both the author and the lecturer discuss whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline or not. The passage claims that ethanol fuel is a good replacement for gasoline. The professor, on the other hand, completely reject whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about the effect of ethanol fuel on global warming. According to the passage, ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, so t causes global warming. Thus, it does not have any environmental advantage rather than other kinds of fuels. The lecturer, nevertheless, reject the author's view and illustrates the idea that planting corn from which ethanol comes lead to absorbing carbon dioxide and decreasing the amount of carbon dioxide, therefore it does not add to the global warming.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss consuming source of food for animals. The author argues that sixty percent of the corn is used for producing ethanol, so it causes the lack of food for animals. However, the professor refutes this, saying that ethanol is obtained from cellules and this part of plants is not eatable for animals, so producing ethanol does not reduce the amount of food for animals.
Eventually, the passage and the lecturer address the subject of price. The passage goes on to mention that ethanol does not have any economical advantage. if government stops the subsides related to the ethanol, the price of this fuel will be increase. In contrast, the professor points out that ethanol fuel does not need constant support and if the ethanol production increases up to three times, its price will decreases forty percent.
All in all, the author maintains that replacement of gasoline with ethanol fuel is not convincing, while the professor not only completely cast doubt on it, but he also demonstrates that ethanol advantages of using ethanol fuel outweigh disadvantages of gasoline fuel.
- Nowadays, children rely too much on the technology, like computers, smartphones, video games for fun and entertainment; playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children’s development. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Tpo22 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. Using specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the author and the lecturer discuss whe...
^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...does not have any economical advantage. if government stops the subsides related t...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...eases up to three times, its price will decreases forty percent. All in all, the autho...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62261796684 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9221733756 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467976716765 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171875516981 0.0996497079465 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972132997092 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272044986836 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314058706099 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.