Essay In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. has been updated.
Validity of greatness of a work of art depends on the purpose of creation of the work. If the art work was created to entertain the crowd, yes, it has to be understood by the masses. If the purpose was to exhibit mastery, it need not be understood or acknowledged by the crowd. It should to be appealing to experts in respective fields.
First, let us consider cinemas. Dunkirk, movie by Christopher Nolan received good reviews from critics, but did not succeed in making money beacuse, it was not appealing to masses. Intention of the movie was to exhibit mastery in cinematography in which it succeeded. Since this was not understood by common masses it cannot be considered as a bad movie. The dark Knight, another movie by same director intended to reach masses but, the critic world was harsh on it. Since the intention of the movie was to reach the masses, I would say movie was a success although it did not recevie postive feedbak from critics.
Furthermore, paintings by Ravindra verma, a famous Indian painter, who captured daily life on canvas are appealing to both masses and renowned painters. His paintings are studied studiously in arts classes around the world also, these paintings are admired by common people. Sometimes art work need not be validated by anyone, it can composed to just please the creator himself. Even in this case if creator is satisfied with the outcome, it need not understood by masses or experts in respective fields.
From all the examples discussed above we can conclude art work can be considered a great work if it succeeds in pleasing it's intended audience. Works which are understood by masses tend to be more famous just because of word of mouth. But works acknowledged by critics will have seperate place in the history or will be awarded with highest honours.
- According to a recent report from our marketingdepartment, during the past year, fewer people attendedSuper Screen-produced movies than in any other year.And yet the percentage of positive reviews by moviereviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 23
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. 50
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio."We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only prev 33
- In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 58
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'art'.
Suggestion: Art Sometimes
...paintings are admired by common people. Sometimes art work need not be validated by anyone, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'compose'
Suggestion: compose
...need not be validated by anyone, it can composed to just please the creator himself. Eve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...place in the history or will be awarded with highest honours.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84294871795 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65630498938 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8595533846 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8823529412 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58823529412 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117354728361 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437294097336 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430834806141 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854855757387 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516985712182 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.