The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the line graph illustrating changes in the number of Londoners using the underground system over the day, from 6 am to 10 pm. In general, the figure fluctuates wildly according to working time of the citizens.
At the beginning of the day, the station has the smallest number of passengers, just 100, yet it increases rapidly and doubles in one hour. This figure continues rocketing to the peak of 400 at 8am when most citizens commute to work. In contrast, the 8-10 am time frame witness a sharp decline, back to less than 200 before rising again during lunch time.
In the afternoon, the quantity of commuters keeps decreasing from 14.00 to 16.00 and reaches the lowest point at 16.00, the same level as the beginning of the day. Nevertheless, a repeated exponential growth can be seen after that, making it almost back to the peak again at 6 pm. During the evening, the figure plunges into a low and stays around this level until the end of the day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | benj212 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | gulbakhyt_90 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | aria etemadi | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of Irish language speaker in five provinces in five years 58
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- Nuclear power is a necessary evil Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fall out nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non renewable energy source Do you agree or disagree 90
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61627906977 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51028172365 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.25 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0692482399896 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298415708491 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473089984758 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054405873168 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410923029832 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.