TPO 43
The reading and the lecture discuss the style of living and eating a group of marine animals that lived about 450 million years ago, and archaeologists find their fossils. Although the passage claims that some theories about how the agnostids would live, the speaker refutes these ideas through several reasons which I will describe in this report.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the agnostids may have lived as free-swimming predator. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that a free-swimming predator has big and well-developed eyes to see their prays. However, the agnostids had tiny and poor develop eyes, and some of them were blind. Hence, they need another special sensor or organs that help them to find their prey. But, their fossils did not have this sensor or organs. As a result, they may have not been a free-swimming predator.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the agnostids could be living on the seafloor. Conversely, the professor argues that seafloor dwellers cannot move fast or move far distance. Also, they move very slowly and we can find them in a small era. However, we find the agnostids fossils in multiple eras; therefore, they could move fast and went to another place. So, they could not have dwelled on the seafloor.
Finally, although the reading passage says that the agnostids may have been parasites, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that the parasites have not a large population and they stay in a small size. Because if they have a large population, they may kill all hosts. Conversely, the fossil records show that the agnostids had a large population, and we find many species of them. Indeed, they may not have parasites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 378, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...d another special sensor or organs that help them to find their prey. But, their fossils did not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04895104895 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58014477283 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9139408611 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9411764706 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8235294118 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42044836075 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143061684282 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653731469017 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244078957407 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505953442589 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.