Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued by a significant number of individuals that the university curriculum should not include academic subjects instead focus on practical learnings during the complete course. I completely agree with this approach and believe that practical knowledge is more easy to understand and their demands in the professional world are high.
To begin with, colleges should pay more attention to practical training rather than paper studies because practical skills are necessary to acquire jobs in the market. Training is essential in a professional field as compared with grades, as these skills are required in daily duties at the workplace. For instance, many industries spend billions of dollar on newly appointed staff to guide them professional skills which are must in their work schedule. Therefore taking such training at college duration can boost the career of a learner.
Similarly, practical training is easy to understand as compared with theoretical books and help every child to understand the logic behind subjects. Workshops and training are inevitable effective tools of learning, therefore universities must incorporate more practical training instead of the theory part. A survey conducted by the education department has revealed that students taking part in projects help them to understand their subjects easily and makes them more confident to work on a professional scale.
To conclude, I agree because hands-on training makes studies easier and the requirement of these skills in the professional world is evident. It is to believe that in future, the education system will have less theoretical studies and more or completely replaced with a practical education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | NRC | 73 | view |
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the modern world. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace a teacher in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern school. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibility of teachers, while others think that this is the role of parents.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs,believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of t 61
- Money should be spent on creating new public buildings, such as museums and town halls, rather than renovating existing ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... which are must in their work schedule. Therefore taking such training at college duratio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...world is evident. It is to believe that in future, the education system will have less th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, therefore, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53846153846 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90952323307 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9368077537 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19630274712 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790079756422 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439564437203 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126646964552 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251342859994 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.