productivity and rewards. summarize points made in lecture and explain how they cast doubt on points made in reading
The lecture and the reading are both about how the productivity and rewards are dependable on each other. A basic management principle is that when a behavior is rewarded it tends to increase the productivity. However in the lecture the speaker doubts if this method really works.
According to the passage whatever the type of reward is given, managerial consultants point out that the promise of such incentives improves employee attitudes, motivation, and productivity. To support this, the speakers says that the employees liked the rewarding schemes. Although, they just want to be paid and given respect for their hard work instead of just the rewarding scheme.
In addition to this the passage also says that some enterprise use other forms of compensation such as special privileges or perhaps, promotion or luxurious vacations and other bonuses in kind. In contrast to this, the speaker says that most of the times the rewards looks like a punishment because for the employees of high productivity the reward is seemed as though they are being controlled or manipulated to work. Additionally they think that they do not get the rewards as expected. Perhaps getting the reward other than expected looked as a punishment. This led to further disappointment.
On top of this , the speaker also says that the productivity schemes would ruin the relationship between the employee and the supervisor. For instance consider that if an employee arose with a doubt but he would withhold the doubt without clarifying it with the supervisor assuming the supervisor might abate the points for his reward scheme. This results in decrease of productivity.
Conclusively, if the reward system is correctly structured, productivity experts argue that it is possible to persuade people to meet remarkable results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... it tends to increase the productivity. However in the lecture the speaker doubts if th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion, and productivity. To support this, the speakers says that the employees lik...
^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n such as special privileges or perhaps, promotion or luxurious vacations and ot...
^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial privileges or perhaps, promotion or luxurious vacations and other bonuses in...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...eing controlled or manipulated to work. Additionally they think that they do not get the rew...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urther disappointment. On top of this , the speaker also says that the product...
^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rther disappointment. On top of this , the speaker also says that the producti...
^^
Line 7, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...abate the points for his reward scheme. This results in decrease of productivity...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, really, so, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95643356182 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56401384083 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3092085786 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123841350341 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437517763018 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496415973231 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737657097783 0.162205337803 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408401628815 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.