Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Marriage is one of the most important relationships in life. Virtually everyone at a certain point in their life dreams about having a long-lasting partner that only death can break up. Although some people may prefer getting married to someone different, I believe it is better to marry a person with your same values, tastes, and a way of seeing life.
The first reason why I have this point of view is that marriage would more enjoyable with someone similar to you. You can do the same entertaining activities, go to the same places, and agree on several topics. For instance, let's suppose you are an ambitious, wealthy man who loves luxurious cars, of well-known brand names, such as Rolls Royce, Maserati, etc. And your wife also loves these kinds of automobiles, you both would be happy to save money to purchase an amazing car. Consequently, both lovers would have fun dreaming together, going to cars exhibitions, and so on. On the other hand, if that very same man had a wife who does not like cars at all, and she loved expensive bags and clothes instead, for her it would not be nice that you want to spend all your money in a "stupid" car. Additionally, she might try to persuade you that clothes are more important than cars and you probably will never buy the car of your dreams. As a result, this partner would not have a complete pleasant marriage due to different tastes.
Second, it is more likely to last a longer time together if you have the same perspective on life. Irreconcilable differences are a common cause of divorce. For couples who think too different is difficult to adapt to the other person. To be specific, if you are an atheist, feminist woman married a Christian man, you would probably have different opinions from your husband about controversial topics. You man may be participating in a pro-life event, while you are in a rebellious mob destroying everything you see to express your anger because you do not have your right to decide giving birth to a baby. At the end of the day, you and your husband may see each other furiously, and then, you begin a discussion. After several weeks of quarrels and drama, you cannot tolerate that situation anymore, and you will decide to go away and not to see you ex-husband anymore. So, as marriages with different beliefs are more likely to discuss, then they are more likely to last less time together.
In summary, I think that marriage partners should be more similar since it is more fun and they are likely to have a longer, calmer relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-28 | elisabetta_fedele | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-12 | vithikasalomi | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | dasepular | 88 | view |
| 2015-03-14 | mayaa | 80 | view |
| 2015-02-03 | zlmgndz | 90 | view |
- Advances in transportation and communication like the airplane and the telephone have changed the way that nations interact with each other in a global society. Choose another technological innovation that you think is important. Give specific reasons for 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A university education should be provided free of charge to all interested scholars. Use examples and reasons to support your position. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is better to marry someone who is similar to you, rather than someone who is different from you. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Suppression of forest fires 85
- Agree or disagree and why Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hat you want to spend all your money in a 'stupid' car. Additionally, s...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, then, well, while, for instance, i think, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2107.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71364653244 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69180975869 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525727069351 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2770146845 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.35 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.35 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326700459412 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987620333472 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731118513109 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162478772022 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114288712246 0.0645574589148 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.