Pie chart
The two pie charts below compare the percentage wise contribution in Turkish economy by various sector's in 2000 and 2016.
At 24% we can see that agriculture accounted for majority of the contribution to GDP of Turkey in 2000, but this percentage had dropped to 14% by 2016. During the same sixteen year period construction sectors rapidly grow and it's share in economy went from just 3% to 10%. However, similar tradition followed by manufacturing sector. By 2016, in economy 12% contribution given by manufacturing sector. Throughout the years 2000 to 2016 trade, utilities and transport contribution increased 2%, which was 16% in 2016.
Interestingly, both health/education sector and leisure/hospitality sectors contribute same percentage to economy in 2000. While contribution of health/education sector remained 17% in 2016, leisure/hospitality contribution fall by 3%. Throughout the years 2000-2016 contribution of government in GDP went from 12% to 9%. Whereas opposite trend in the case of finanace, business and other sectors. In 2000 finance, business and other sector's contribution is 5%, by 2016 contribution increased to 8%.
- Some people think that modern technology is naking people less sociable, while others think it is making them less sociabke. Dicuss both views. 61
- Demad of food is increasing 56
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six month period in 2001. 56
- In towns and cities, large shopping malls replace the small local shops. 62
- Pie chart 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...rs. In 2000 finance, business and other sectors contribution is 5%, by 2016 contributio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59770114943 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59368234282 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5171081529 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.049693133999 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253584132114 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801903435959 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929808484419 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131494776908 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.