Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems. Some people say they should be banned.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's modern world, the environmental crisis in which mankind barely survives has become a major concern. Thus, a part of the population believes that a measure to reduce this crisis is to prohibit plastic shopping bags. Personally, I completely agree with this statement, however, I believe that there are other ways to improve this situation.

To begin, the main reason that shows how important is to stop using plastic bags is the fact that they are very dangerous for animals. To explain that, the environment is not only the flora of the planet but the fauna as well, so anything that has negative impact on any of them should be stopped. More precisely, the lightweight of these bags gives them the ability to travel with the help of the wind to every place in the world. Unfortunately, since the Earth is 65% covered by water, they end up in oceans, where sea creatures like turtles eat them because they consider them as jellyfishes. Individual studies have shown that almost 1.500 underwater animals find death caused by plastic bags. Therefore, the prohibit of these bags is essential for their survival.

Nevertheless, from my perspective and experience, banning plastic bags is a temporary and necessary solution, however, it will not change dramatically the enviromental dead-end in which we are. Therefore, the government with the assistance of global organizations should educate the population about major environmental problems, like the greenhouse effect and deforestation. They should raise awareness in the population about the importance to maintain our planet clean. Thus, with these actions and the ban on plastic bags, many environmental problems will be reduced.

To conclude, it is apparent that we live in a nearly destroyed planet. Although, it is in our hands to reverse this situation. The prohibit of plastic bags with a targeted education about the environment will soon prevent the detriment future of our kind.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-03-15 kimvop 87 view
2021-06-28 sharanbhullar 56 view
2021-06-28 sharanbhullar 61 view
2021-07-27 ann228ann 84 view
Essays by user gies5566 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 710, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eath caused by plastic bags. Therefore, the prohibit of these bags is essential for their su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 72, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t we live in a nearly destroyed planet. Although, it is in our hands to reverse this sit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...in our hands to reverse this situation. The prohibit of plastic bags with a targeted educati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...event the detriment future of our kind.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23417721519 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88606900954 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6472427865 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185166624587 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537083413884 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350339289063 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977338655202 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462973490315 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.