International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do Advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Due to the rising economy and the rapid expansions of budget airlines, people can fly to any corner of the world to enjoy their holidays. Although the growth of tourism industry can positively influence a country, it also exerts certain impacts. Personally, I believe that the merits would eclipse the demerits.
Providing economic incentives is unarguably the primary contribution of tourism. Indeed, visitors from developed nations are willing to spend extravagantly on their vacations so that they can enjoy the nature of the host nation to the full. Therefore, this particular mindset gives rise to many entrepreneurial opportunities which local businesses can take advantage of to raise their revenues. Specifically, the model, tours coupled with environmental protection activities, from underdeveloped nations where nature has yet been replaced by industrial zones has attracted flocks of tourists from rich continents.
Likewise, the upsurge of transitional arrival results in the increasing popularity of a country’s image on the internet. In particular, visiting historical sites is a top priority as these areas lend a glance to the rise and fall of dynasties over a nation’s course of history. Lessons asides, sightseers also want to capture the moments in these ruins by photography and flaunt them on the news feed, which appealing backgrounds could arouse the curiosity of other users. As a result, the relevant visual or reading references to those places would eventually enjoy more searches. However, traditional values could be in jeopardy due to cultural commercialization. Truly, expatriates who just have scant awareness of the local historical significance could render an old heritage site even more dilapidated through acts of vandalism such as name carving. Consequently, such mindless and deliberate action could pave the way to the lost of ethnical evidence and economic loss.
Nevertheless, the number of similar accidents could be halved by legal intervention. No sensible minds on the course of their journey want their experience affected by being fined or jailed. Therefore, local authorities can issue policies that protect their traditional sites from physical harms and in other words, any violations ensue heavy fines and possible prison sentences. With this deterrence in mind, people regardless of nationality will respect where they tread on.
In conclusion, despite a minor drawback mentioned above, which could be countered by a simple step, a develop hospitality sector can boost a country’s finance and international fame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Dongvo | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | Ngô Chí Hào | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | ghotimus | 11 | view |
| 2017-09-07 | Sue Ng. | 61 | view |
- 1. People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 11
- International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do Advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 89
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 61
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create? What are some solutions? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 101, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ch could be countered by a simple step, a develop hospitality sector can boost a country&...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66240409207 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15107366552 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649616368286 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6425011462 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.526315789 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0493744342358 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133516449666 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256548529629 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0279976614712 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243433348984 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 78.4519038076 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.