Some people think scientific research is a waste of time and money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed by many people that the expenditure of effort on scientific studies is worthless regarding the amount of time and money spent on them. Although I believe there are certain reasons on which this opinion holders are counting, the benefits that humankind could cultivate from the results of those researches are too significant to ignore, because of which I am strongly against the statement.
It is undeniable that the outcomes of scientific researches contribute hugely to the advancement of the world, especially in terms of dealing with the once unsolvable issues, such as those relating to human health. Particularly, with the development of science, humans, nowadays, are not only any longer suffering from various fatal diseases which used to be mysteries, for instance diarrhoea, but also able to travel thousand miles within a course of a few hours, enhancing productivities of the work and removing the invisible wall separating people. Thus, scientific studies must be carried out for the good of humanity.
Furthermore, scientific achievements enable humans to correct the mistakes that cause disasters all over the world by providing causal grounds and solutions to keep humankind from being erased off the earth. It is a well-known fact that natural catastrophes are the consequences of people’s careless activities that have been tremendously damaging the environment. Hence, acknowledging the causes and adopting proven methods are essential, and it could only be achievable with the help of scientific knowledge. For example, it is obvious that scientifically advanced countries suffer less from the water crisis since the government understands the reasons for the shortages and implements needed solutions with the support of sufficient science-based knowledge.
In conclusion, although I appreciate the concerns, I firmly disagree that it would be a waste of time and money to carry out scientific researches owing to the long-lasting positive impacts on the world’s development and solving current critical problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture,others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Some people say modern children's games do not develop a wide range of skills, while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Some believe that lot of scientific research is a waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61904761905 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13499738705 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612698412698 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4985314535 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.0 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152316888338 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061123303493 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587991179472 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101787679774 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549701711345 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.0946893788 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.