Earlier technological development brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the past, before the Invention of technology development, people performed all functions manually. On the other hand employers used human resources freely and inexpensively. Traditional arts and crafts such as, pottery, masking, paintings and handcrafts were very popular in ancient time whilst these skills most often formed the basis of communities were recognized by country trades. However people got massive benefits after the technological development but some others think this evaluation made a sedentary person to the society.
Drastically, this technological development increased the quality and quantity whilst achieving maximum in the minimum time period such as transportation, computer, machinery and communication. According to these benefits humans love to living inside home than going outdoors whilst they have sedentary life styles combined with fast foods. On the other hand technological advancement have resulted the end of once important traditional skills which were regarded as extremely important cultural heritage of country. Sadly, this advancement also narrows the scope of employment in the country. The most important thing is in this present millennium, people were affected by many health problems such as overweight, cancers, heart dieses and back pains because of they have inactive life style with technological development.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with this because we must need to change with the beneficial technological development. Moreover, in many industrial countries vastly develop machinery in many fields. Thus people must need to know how to manage their life style with this development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Dinuka Dissanayaje | 55 | view |
- More information available online so, library books are useless. Agree or disagree with the statement? 77
- As a result of advances in medical care average life expectancy is increasing for men and women Do you think most people will see this as a positive development What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society Support your po 65
- Some people believe paper- based English language exams are superior to computer based one. 55
- People spending more hours in the office. it impacts on personal life. What is your opinion? 55
- It is believed that universities should enroll men and women in equal numbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ties were recognized by country trades. However people got massive benefits after the t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...t, cancers, heart dieses and back pains because of they have inactive life style with technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their life style with this development.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85950413223 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07842364951 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632231404959 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3876676355 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178399418467 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670069071791 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530259756062 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124562310742 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00405353488122 0.0609392437508 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.