International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country that they visited. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Foreign tourism has been an industry of which both destinations and travelers can take advantage. While this may bring about a number of detrimental effects, I would argue that it offers more benefits.
On the one hand, multinational travel is recognized as a major contributing factor of several social concerns. From a health perspective, tourist discovering a new region will expose to an unusual climate pattern as well as flora and fauna, which may carry health risk. For example, if Western tourists travel to a tropical Asian country, they will be vulnerable to dangerous ailments like flu or rare infectious diseases, accidentally leading to a global outbreak of an epidemic. From a social perspective, at attractions which swarm with tourists, such behaviors violating local codes of conduct as littering or smoking in restaurants are witnessed due to visitors’ lack of social conscience. Consequently, residents are deprived of tranquility and social order, which exerts negative impacts on the entire community.
On the other hand, I opine that the benefits of international tourism are more significant. Regarding to travelers, no sooner do they pay a visit to a foreign heritage than they contemplate its aesthetic quality and entirely grasp the sophistication of local civilization. This not only helps them enrich their experience but also develops mutual understanding between nations, which cannot be reaped by domestic tourism. Regarding to destinations, it is believed that if they are thronged with tourists, the region can create its prosperity and dramatically flourish. Indeed, in order to have the holiday of a lifetime, travelers never hesitate to break the bank; therefore, this results in a massive flux of money and a heating demand of employees in service sector.
Briefly, while disadvantages of multinational tourism should not be overlooked, I believe that they are outweighed by its benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-08 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people 89
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 89
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- This table shows the percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... argue that it offers more benefits. On the one hand, multinational travel i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive impacts on the entire community. On the other hand, I opine that the ben...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18715477433 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643333333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7416681974 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143500991659 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474129835199 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436408081732 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888849547847 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203809160437 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.