Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There is a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that we can taste variety of fruits and vegetables can not only contribute to establishment of different branded showrooms like Adidas and Nike but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of pollution due to transportation. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today’s life changing lifestyles. Besides, its impact on global economy is far reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against eroding values of traditional goods.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of global economy and transportation are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | English time | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | lovepreetdhillon | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | jashan randhawa | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | manpreet9999 | 72 | view |
- It town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small shops. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive and negative impact on people's life and work 55
- some people think that it is good to lay out for leisure time activities and other think that there is no need for any outlining 55
- It town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small shops. Do you agree or disagree? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03985507246 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92288696685 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0121516242 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.916666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147764225884 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505808359702 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08892060092 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087288366462 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711765179568 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.