Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the dis disadvantages.
The importance of global economy which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that global economy is beneficial for all world because which things we daily using it is for global economy as well as global economy distributing all goods to all world of the countries as an illustration there are so many mobile phones daily establishing in all countries they supply their phones by transported. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that global economy supplies us with all clothes and vehicles. Needless to say all these merits stand global economy in a good stead.
However there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming is that global economy supplies some absurd things to our countries cheap and spoil thing by transport moreover global economy can decrease currency of all small countries. Besides, global economy produced some cheap things to countries as well as global economy supply fruits to all countries on expensive rates. Hence it is apparent why many are against global economy.
According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefit of global economy is instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | English time | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | lovepreetdhillon | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | jashan randhawa | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | manpreet9999 | 72 | view |
- mobiles phones and internet are useful in life. agree or disagree. 77
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each years, what are the cause of this crucial problem? what are the solution? 55
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree. 85
- credit card advantages or disadvantages do you agree or disagree 75
- Should university penalize student for late submission their work? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...stand global economy in a good stead. However there are some pitfalls that negate the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 476, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ts to all countries on expensive rates. Hence it is apparent why many are against glo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
... global economy is instrumental indeed. Nevertheless the potential drawbacks should not be o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25954198473 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67321933739 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530534351145 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.315890733 50.4703680194 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 137.8 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158076626327 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689645631041 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492343261035 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891150079385 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461726079004 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.