In a number of countries, some people think that it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A section of society consider that it is essential to use a vast amount of wealth on establishing new railway tracks for fastest trains between urban areas; since, others supports to expand money to recover conditions of old public transport. This easy will shed light on both notions along with my opinion.
One school of thought said that it is mandatory to spend a huge some of money for constructing new railway lines for faster rails because these trains are helping humans for save time. Apart from that, in today is whirled everyone have metic schedule due to their wish to earn more income to providing best bread and butter to their families. In addition to this, these fastest rails useful for masses to reach them their work place very quickly and they can consume a some amount of time to travel by trains and use this time in another work. For example, a metro train in Delhi are very helpful for their citizens because it is very fast and people reaching at their destination with in some minutes.
The another school of thought support second view the reason is that a wealth should spent to recovering existing public transport because if regime will spend a some number of money to repair old government vehicles than it’s beneficial for authorities’s funds. Moreover, these transport are staying freely at one place and these vehicles have not any advantages, so, if these public transport repairs by regime than it give some income in form of fairs of vehicles. Beside that, these old transport can take little sum of wealth for recovering and better to save vast amount of wealth for nations. In other words, government vehicles are helping to reduce congestion of private vehicles on roads. For example, in PRTC workshops of Punjab government, a huge amount of existing buses are staying there freely because they need repairing but regime neglect to use wealth on those to repair and buy new one buses which affect government ‘s fund.
In my opinion, they both views are better for nations because faster trains are beneficial for consuming time and reaching quickly as well as government vehicles are necessary for repairing and offer income to authorities.
In conclusion, although, faster trains are useful to save time but old public transports are also helpful to recover economy growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries for the period 1960 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 56
- The first chart shows the population of England and Wales between 1700 and 2000 The second chart gives information about the birth and death rates in the same countries and same periods Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 47
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Number of traffic are growing day by day on roads? What is the reason behind this? How can be solve it? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... view the reason is that a wealth should spent to recovering existing public tran...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, well, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5021804319 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492346938776 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3917891243 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.692307692 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1538461538 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257126860486 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944448668364 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755833710936 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134431232206 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467252013257 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.