Changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK
technology has a rapid change in our life. Today's modern technology is the most part of each home. By doing this, uk researchers find the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes. As a result, they show the top trend of using modern technology is dvd player at 2008 and the lowest portion of their life is depends on internet connection.
On the other hand, mobile phone fluctuated slightly but its trend was upward until 2004 and then it rose steadily. Furthermore, access to the CD player leaped dramatically until 2003 and after that, it drops gradually. In contrast to the access of dvd player which just have 30% of the whole usage of the uk's modern technology in their homes in 2002.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-10 | Nguyên-MTTN | view | |
2023-08-22 | Vinty | 79 | view |
2023-06-11 | Phan Quang Tuan | 73 | view |
2022-11-15 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
2022-10-14 | ducmap03 | 11 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various eveningcourses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information aboutthe ages of these course participants. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
technology has a rapid change in our life. Todays ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 584.0 965.302439024 60% => OK
No of words: 125.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.672 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.34370152488 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52430109139 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.664 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 170.1 283.868780488 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4411102225 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4285714286 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 5.23603664747 237% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478779217529 0.215688989381 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213372049858 0.103423049105 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169549963503 0.0843802449381 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35937814641 0.15604864568 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146781513728 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.