Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The topic raises the issue of moral judgment versus respect when it comes to leadership. Although moral judgment is sometimes necessary to a leader, it can not be more important than the respect for others. Thus, I agree with the statement and would argue that the ability to maintain the respect is crucial to a great leader.
First of all, leaders of companies or governments usually deal with a very different kids of people. People are from different races, have different backgrounds and beliefs, and also have their own preferences and interests, which varies a lot. All this diversity is often very beneficial to the society and to companies, because it helps to create a more creative environment, which is very helpful in situations involving problems to be solved. If a leader keeps judging his peers, this attittude can innibe his peers to give they own opions and they the creativity will be harmed. As a consequence, new and creative solutions will not arise from the team.
Also, when a leader is very judmental, people can start being against him, and he will probably become a less effective leader because people do not want to follow him anymore. So, showing respect is a way of being seen as a great leader, a person who knows and is concerned about his peers. This makes people feel like they are important, and helps to create a good environment for cooperation, which is very important to lead companies and governments to great results.
However, in some situations a leader must use moral judment to take a position. For example, imagine a situation in which the leader's peer is doing something immoral or illegal like twrethening a collegue or desviating money from the company. In this case, it is the leader's role to properly advert his peer about the innadequate behavior or even take more drastic actions, like fire his peer.
In conclusion, I believe that althout moral judgment is necessary when it comes to avoid harmful behaviors towards the company and society, in situations involving personal positions, aspirations or beliefs, the leader should priorize the respect instead of being judgmental.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. Th 63
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 63
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'kid'?
Suggestion: kid
...ents usually deal with a very different kids of people. People are from different ra...
^^^^
Line 13, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...om the company. In this case, it is the leaders role to properly advert his peer about ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02801120448 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71392868526 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532212885154 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2430374674 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239112491861 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846655430299 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501095951783 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140587353408 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631943409276 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.