Cane toad population growth discussion
Both reading passage and lecturer discussing about possible way to eliminate cane toad population growth because of its harmful effect on native animals. Reading passage provided three method to remove the population of the harmful animal. However, lecturer think than even the reading passage mentioned possible way to decrease population growth of cane toad, those method are not successful enough. Further, lecturer stated her opinion in each method why it is not the best way.
First of all, the reading passage stated the one way to prevent the spread of the toad would be building a fence. So that, it will work as barrier by preventing population spread to another country. But, in this situation, lecturer further explain that even the barrier build in some area the eggs will carried by water way to another place. She concluded that fence is not effective way to stop population growth.
Secondly, passage raised another way to decrease its growth by receiving help from volunteer. Because cane toads are possible to caught by bare hands. Even thought, it counted as ineffective way as a lecturer for the reason of its body size and distinguishing character. She believes that untrained volunteer might destroy native frogs because the appearance of baby cane toad and frogs are hard to distinguish.
Lastly, disease causing virus for cane toad that developed by researchers is one of three method controlling the population that stated in reading passage. It considered effective way in passage because the virus is specially designed for cane toad and would not harm other species. Be that as it may, lecturer explain that this method will endanger the ecosystem and due to implementing this method whole eco-system would suffer.
In sum, every implementation to control cane toad's population grown that stated in reading passage is considered as ineffective way to lecturer.
- The diagram below shows an automatic photo booth Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Your friend has decided to switch careers, but is not sure which to choose. What advice would you give them? Provide reasons and examples to support your response. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading the newspaper or online news sources is a waste of time Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 53
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Professional athletes are born with talent You cannot train someone to be a professional athlete Provide reasons and examples to support your response 70
- University should receive same financial support as classes. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'those methods'?
Suggestion: this method; those methods
...ecrease population growth of cane toad, those method are not successful enough. Further, lec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'carry'
Suggestion: carry
...arrier build in some area the eggs will carried by water way to another place. She conc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rowth by receiving help from volunteer. Because cane toads are possible to caught by ba...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2262295082 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66516037365 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485245901639 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9307986541 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06452816374 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342934447858 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128006063389 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110480919203 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20613383868 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686886658363 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.