It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
Nowadays, the ways of education for students have gotten important. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether it is important to emphasize concepts and not facts. I agree with the opinion which is saying the ideas can help students to perceive their lessons better. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, do not have a practical view about problems, influence the learning of students in schools. To put on the other hand, teachers should teach students, why something is important and how they can use it in the real world. It is crystal clear, the students who have no idea about the lessons in the real world and just try to memorize facts cannot help companies in the future. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home, I am going to speak about my friend who used to study lessons and never tried to use them practically. Once upon a time, while he was preparing for the exam of computer programming, he noticed the exam will occur on the computers of the university. A bad score in the first exam was the first result of memorizing facts instead of using practical knowledge. After a while, he had to change his mind and rely on ideas and concept, therefore, in the next exam, he got a good score. My friend faced these difficulties neither for not being intelligence nor for not being hard-working, he had faced it because he learned lessons badly.
Furthermore, leaning concepts has influenced not only on practical view but also on innovation. Innovation is a powerful tool which helps students to improve their knowledge. To be specific, learning ideas, lets students have the opportunity to acquire how to find a solution for a problem and these kinds of students will change their society, in the future. As an illustration, I have been leading the developers of a computer company since I finished university. When I was in university, our professor compelled us to go to a company and trying to solve their problems in new ways. This event has affected my future. If our professors had never compelled us to go to the company, I would not be the lead developer and a person who can change the projects in the company.
In conclusion, I do believe relying on ideas instead of facts, is a better choice. Since the decision helps students to have knowledge in practical ways also improve their innovation for solving problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | supergirl20 | view | |
| 2020-01-03 | m.shahbazi | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | nusybah | 63 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | nusybah | 66 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 83
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 58
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 72
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78095238095 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78204785175 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6405588215 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.619047619 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240180157888 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670881841787 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540002767722 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167301345852 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524674194112 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.