It is necessary for parents to attend a parenting training course to bring their children up. Do you agree or disagree?
In the rapid urbanization, effective parenting skill has become indispensable for the upbringing of children. A segment of society believes that attending a course on parenting is mandatory to enhance the skills. This essay will shed light on my partial agreement to the statement in the following paragraphs before making a final note.
The prime factor for parents taking coaching on care-giving is engagement in a work-life. Both the parents work due to a rise in the cost of living as well as to meet the demands of their children. In this process, they are unable to spend quality time with their offspring. Thus, there are high chances that the emotional development of their wards gets hampered which can lead them towards defiant behaviour. For instance, according to one research report, children of working couples are more likely to become involved in risky, complicated behaviours, including aggression and drug use. Hence, attending lessons on nurturing could help busy couples in educating their buds.
Nevertheless, tutorials on parenting may be redundant for custodians who keep a work-life balance. To elaborate more, these parents are able to raise children without impeding their career. Moreover, they understand when their family needs more attention at the same time are adept in realizing the energy which is required for their career. Another reason for learning parenting could be superfluous is a waste of money. The centres may charge a high amount for tutoring the parenting approaches which might be impractical while applying in real-life situations. Therefore, it is needless for such fosters to learn the skill of parenting.
In conclusion, enrolling in school for enhancing styles of parenting could be beneficial in nurturing children; however, it may be unessential and misspending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | Mahsa Alimohammadi | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nikaumarova | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | sameersomaya | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | sbsomaya | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | sbsomaya | 89 | view |
- Number of men and women in different evening courses 78
- Recyling of cotton t shirts 78
- movie making budget 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 67
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities, which are played alone. To what extent to you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ork due to a rise in the cost of living as well as to meet the demands of their children. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 371, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to parent'.
Suggestion: to parent
...eir career. Another reason for learning parenting could be superfluous is a waste of mone...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40909090909 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91411489593 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618881118881 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1045992379 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306204656305 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104050859963 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574996024392 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184892035106 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342734286798 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.