Nowadays children's writing and mathematical abilities are affected by computers and calculators. some people argue that we should limit the use of these tools in schools. Do you agree or disagree?
In these concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that computers and calculators effect on children's writing and mathematical abilities. Some people concur that usage of technological tools should be limited by us in schools. However I quibble from them and profound that benefits of technology outweigh it's drawbacks.
Adequate evidence are obtainable to substantiate the concept of modern technology's advantages. The top-notch concrete reason is technological tools provide convenience by offering a faster pace in writing and calculation process because of which the expose of students to more practice materials on the subject is being increased. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is the usage of technological tools makes students techno buzz. They get used to applying computer at a tender age. This helps them at the later stage in colleges and in jobs because these places use them extensively. To exemplify, I would quote an instance of my brother who is a successful computer engineer due to computers and calculators which is prima facie testimony.
Life is like a coin, pleasure and pain are two sides. Only one side is visible at a time but remember other side is waiting for it's turn. So public in general tend to contend that student are made dependent by gadgets. Even for small calculations they feel the need to switch their computers. This dependence inhibits natural growth of skills and abilities and make them vulnerable. For example, in a developing country, students are using computers and calculators to carry out even small calculations like " 10*20 ". Withal they also upload that candidates are so psychologically reliant on computers and calculators that they can't learn for their exams.
In recapitulation, I reiterate there are innumerable factors supporting increased applications of computers and calculators are inevitable. However it'scontrary can be overlooked. Consequently I disagree with the given statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | JvalPatel2407 | 85 | view |
- Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together. To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one another? 61
- Some people think that parents should give money as a gift to teenagers. Other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Nowadays children s writing and mathematical abilities are affected by computers and calculators some people argue that we should limit the use of these tools in schools Do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people believe that Government should ban dangerous sports while others believe that it is an individual choice. Do you agree or disagree? 61
Comments
Hello everyone we here right…
Hello everyone we here right site what is dll and more this is right time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ols should be limited by us in schools. However I quibble from them and profound that b...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 640, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... on computers and calculators that they cant learn for their exams. In recapitu...
^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...mputers and calculators are inevitable. However itscontrary can be overlooked. Conseque...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... However itscontrary can be overlooked. Consequently I disagree with the given statement.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47712418301 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12613770994 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624183006536 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0779779873 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2105263158 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162559821103 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460518094649 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061869217299 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107256366822 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821412087396 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.